A Social Media Agency’s Monday News Round Up – Monday 1st September 2014: Naked Pics, Teacher Tweets and Facebook Makes Us Depressed
Afternoon social media fans, today’s weekend round-up comes slightly later than usual, but hey, we’re just getting over the fact that it’s September and summer is officially over *sad face*.
Naked Picture Leak
If you’ve been online today, you can’t have failed to notice the main story everyone seems to be talking about it. Hackers managed to unearth naked pictures of several celebrities, including Jennifer Lawrence, for the entire internet to see. The hackers is reported to have 60 explicit images in his possession after he apparently managed to access the pictures through Apple’s iCloud service.
Other celebrities allegedly involved include Rihanna and Kim Kardashian. The good news is that Twitter are now suspending all accounts which publish the naked pictures.
Teacher Apologised for Tweet
A teacher in the US has apologised for posting offensive tweets, after she updated her account claiming that she wanted to “stab some kids” and pour coffee on “the little a-holes”. Eesh. The teacher in California received a written reprimand from district officials after a colleague alerted the school to her musings.
If you’re ever considering tweeting about stabbing and pouring coffee over kids who are supposed to be in your care, we would recommend signing out of Twitter and going outside for a long walk.
Read more about the story on The Drum.
Facebook Makes Users Distrusting and Miserable
New research has found that a number of social networks, including Facebook, “may threaten subjective well-being” by eroding the user’s trust in the rest of society with exposure to homophobic, racist or misogynistic content. Unsurprising really, when you think about how many times you want to put your first through the screen every time you see an idiot give their ridiculous views on current events.
The survey found that the affect of being exposed to such behaviour could have a harmful effect on people’s mental wellbeing.
If you were considering getting rid of Facebook from your life, this seems like a good a reason as any to go for it. You can read more on The Telegraph.
by Iona St Joseph
A Social Media Agency’s Likes and Fails – 29th August – Facebook improves mobile search & Google removes authorship
Here we are then, it’s Friday and here are the Likes and Fails for today. We take a look at Facebook’s plans to improve their mobile search and the news that Google is removing it’s Authorship feature.
Facebook have finally done something to improve their search feature. Their mobile search options, to put it lightly were extremely lacking, with it impossible to find anything worthwhile. They are currently testing a feature for mobile which will let users search through old posts from their friends by using keywords to resurface buried content. The feature will only let you find things that were previously available to you, so basically you can’t find anything behind those privacy filters. Facebook say that the test will be an improvement to search on mobile, which currently isn’t saying much as the standard so far for mobile search has not been good.
It’s surprising that this option hasn’t been available before especially as it really should be how it worked from the start. The feature isn’t currently available to everyone yet, but when it does come out it will be simple as writing in ‘blah blah’s birthday’ and that should show up photos from that persons birthday (if they exist of course!).
Google Authorship is over. A spokesperson has announced that Google is ending their authorship feature which links your Google Plus profile with any articles you write on the internet. The spokesperson went on to say that part of the reason they were ending the feature is that it hadn’t proved as useful to users as they hoped it would. They said that in their tests taking away the authorship didn’t reduce traffic to sites, nor did it increase clicks on adverts.
Google search users will still see Google Plus posts from friends and pages which are relevant to their search. the authorship change doesn’t affect these results.
The feature was only around for three years, and they stopped showing the profile pictures alongside content in June because they wanted to unify the desktop search results with mobile results to create a unified experience. Research also showed that out of 500 only 151 people had their authorship accounts set up properly, which could have also been another reason Google decided to remove the feature, simply because it was too complicated for some.
by Helen Stirling
A Social Media Agency – Likes and Fails – 28th August – Twitter analytics for all & selfie mad teenagers
It’s Thursday already, and now we’re bringing you another edition of Likes and Fails!
Twitter has opened up it’s analytics service for everyone. They previously made the service available to all marketers, verified users and twitter card publishers but now it’s available to everyone with a Twitter account.
The analytics page is really helpful for brands to see how their tweets are performing and what might not be working so well. Hell, you can even check what people like to see from your personal account so you can entertain the masses more accurately. The dashboards let you see the impressions your tweet has received the interactions it’s had, whether clicks, retweets, replies or favourites.
As long as your account is more than 14 days old and not restricted or suspended and your main Twitter language is English, French, Japanese or Spanish, then you can view your analytics. The only question now is why Twitter have opened this up to other users? It could be an attempt to get users to mine their previous content and therefore improve their future content which could prove a draw for new users, which as we already know is what Twitter wants.
A girl has been caught out doing what teenagers do these days. Yep, taking selfies. A dad noticed his teenage daughter contorting and pulling strange faces in the back of the car and so started secretly filming her, and the result is bizarre and well, slightly worrying. The video tells the whole story really, but the selfie craze is proven to be well and truly alive.
Who would have thought a couple or more years ago that teenagers would be spending their time staring at their own face taking pictures of it. What ever happened to reading a magazine or a book to keep you entertained in the car? Well I guess they put them on the phones and the allure of their own faces were just a little bit more interesting…
by Helen Stirling
Facebook competitions are like Peter Andre’s mysterious girl, we know what they are but yet we know so little about them, and what are the rules? Can you do this or that? Most people never really seem sure.
There has long been a call for clearer guidelines on Facebook competitions, and many people wanting to run their own competitions have been confused as to what was actually breaking the rules. As well all know it’s important not to break the rules on Facebook as they can deactivate and remove a business page without warning if it breaches the terms and conditions set out online.
The basics are outlined in their promotions terms and conditions. The official guidelines require that you are responsible for the lawful operation of the promotion, and that it is made clear that the promotion has no link to or is endorsed by Facebook or it’s affiliates.
You can see all the rules that are laid out here:
“1. If you use Facebook to communicate or administer a promotion (ex: a contest or sweepstakes), you are responsible for the lawful operation of that promotion, including:
There is recent news now that Facebook is banning ‘Like-gating’ which means that pages will no longer be allowed to make a user to like their page to enter a competition. The change to their terms is an attempt to reduce the amount of spam-my Likes on brand pages, and to make information clearer for users.
by Helen Stirling
A Social Media Agency’s Likes & Fails – 27th August – Hyperlapse from Instagram & Self-censoring online
Posted in: Apple Apps Blog Facebook Fail Instagram Like Likes and Fails News Online Social Media Twitter Vine
Here are today’s Likes and Fails – today we take a look at Instagram’s new app Hyperlapse as well as looking at the rise in online self-censoring on Social Media sites.
The app is a video sharing app which can turn your video clips into ‘hyperlapse’ videos, which gives a cinematic feel to the videos. Much like quick sequences you see in films when moving from one place to the other, this app now allows users to create the cool same effect without all the expensive equipment. Basically the app has built in stabilizing features which create the smooth moving effect in the finished videos. To use the app you only have to press the record option once and then press it again to stop recording. You can either play the video back at normal speed or create the hyperlapse at up to 12 times its original speed. You can then save the video by clicking the green check mark, and from there share the video.
This is a n exciting new development from the Instagram team, as many were focused on the launch of bolt – the Snapchat competitor – from them, but they surprised everyone with the launch of a completely different app with some really interesting technology involved.
We can only hope the delay whilst the make it available for Android is not too long, as currently it is only available for Apple devices.
There are reports today that surveys have shown that users on Twitter and Facebook are increasingly self-censoring themselves regarding controversial topics. The study looked specifically at the fallout following the Edward Snowden leaks and peoples willingness to talk about the topic. A large majority of Americans, 86%, said that they were open to talking about the leaks and the impact of the government intrusion on privacy but only 43% said they were comfortable about talking about it online on Facebook and even less, 41%, said they would discuss it on Twitter
The survey also found, that people were more willing to share their thoughts on the case if they thought their audience would agree with them. Which is not really surprising. Though the report also suggests that people were less likely to share their opinions offline if they thought that their online friends and followers would disagree with their opinion. This displays a crossover between the two worlds which may mean that important information is not being shared between mediums and that the censoring is passing over into in-person contexts. Though this was not definitively shown in the survey, though it was suggested by the data received.
This is an interesting look at self-censoring, which we probably encounter daily online. I know personally I’ve had an opinion on a topic online but have not shared my opinion for fear of getting involved in an online argument which I did not want to deal with. I think this fear of ‘online confrontation’ is what leads us to shy away from sharing our opinions online. It is a lot easier for someone to counter your argument online, sometimes in an aggressive way, without any lasting backlash. Whereas if the same confrontation happened in-person there would definitely be some sort of lasting message, whether it be law enforcement of just the fact that the relationship with the person was ended.
by Helen Stirling
A Social Media Agency’s Likes and Fails – 26th August – Facebook doesn’t like click bait & Macmillan steals ice challenge
Here are today’s post bank-holiday likes and fails!
Facebook have decided to start clamping down on click bait articles on the site. This should hopefully start to clear out annoying content from users feeds. You’ve probably noticed more recently that your feed is filled with tons of rubbish click bait articles that your friends have shared. I know I have, it does get very tiresome, especially when I simply use the site to see what friends are up to, as well as running brand pages. These articles are especially annoying as they don’t give anything away in the title, but just enough that the user is forced to click through to find out more.
The example that Facebook gave was: “You’ll NEVER believe which two stars got into a fight on the red carpet last night!! CLICK to find out which starlet they were fighting over!!”.
This means that Facebook will be changing their algorithm slightly to make less of these articles appear in feeds, this is obviously not great news for the publisher sites but Facebook says only a small set of publishers will see a distribution change and that the changes are necessary so as to not drain out the things people want to see on Facebook.
Macmillan, the cancer charity has come under a bit of fire online regarding their jump onto the online fad of chucking ice water over your head for charity. Originally when the ice bucket challenge started in America it was in aid of the ALS Association, which helps those with motor neurone disease, also know as Lou Gehrig’s. The challenge quickly grew in popularity when celebrities got in on the act and people were uploading their own video challenges to social media and raising millions for the charity. As the challenges spread over to the UK Macmillan saw their chance and started asking that people donate to their charity and do the ice bucket challenge. Now you may think, why is it bad to hijack a charity challenge for your own charity, it’s all charity right?
Well some are saying it was a little tactless of Macmillan, as cancer is a well known disease and one of the most donated to diseases. Whereas Lou Gehrigs disease is much lesser known and could definitely help, in awareness of the disease as well as working on curing it. There are calls for people to consider the UK association for Motor Neurone diseases (http://www.mndassociation.org/). Some have taken note of this and the charity have currently raised £1 million from ice bucket donations.
Macmillan have defended themselves though and said they thought it was a good idea to take the initiative to get involved with the challenge as they had been previously criticized for being slow on the uptake when the no make-up selfie was popular earlier in the year.
The details for donating are here:
Macmillan ask people to film themselves doing the ice bucket challenge, post it online and donate £3 to the cause by texting ICE to 70550.
You can also donate to the Motor Neurone Disease Association by texting ICED55 £5 – or any other amount – to 70070.
by Helen Stirling
A Social Media Agency’s Likes and Fails – 22nd August – Instagram business tolls & Twitter promoted content latches on to hashtags
Here are today’s Likes and Fails for your viewing pleasure this Friday!
We mentioned it earlier, but interesting news today that Instagram have added 3 new business tools to help brands engage with fans and grow their following. The 3 tools are account insights, ad insights and ad staging. The new tools are expected to roll out over the coming weeks and months but there is currently no exact time frame or market.
Instagram say that they decided to add the new analytic and advert tools after receiving feedback from users (something that Twitter should probably take note of…). The tools will allow insight into how users have engaged with their photos and campaigns so as well as monitoring the activity, there will be suggestions for the best time to post.
The account insights will let a brand know their impressions, their reach and their engagement with fans and users. The ad insights will do the same for adverts ran on the platform but will also show this in relation to the target audience of the advert. The ad staging does what it says on the tin, this is a place to create, edit and publish adverts to the platform.
Advertisers will be getting the first access to these new tools though once they’ve received feedback from these initial users they will look to improve the tools and roll them out more widely to other brands. Don’t forget that ads are still fairly rare, only showing up in the US at the moment as they don’t want to scare off users. They still plan to roll these out slowly to other territories and countries.
Twitter are meddling again. This time their attaching promoted content to your tweets! The change is currently only seen on the iOS app version of Twitter, but it means that Twitter can try and attach some sort of content to your tweet if you use a related hashtag to the content they have available. So for example, what’s been seen at the moment is that if you use the hashtag #ABCSelfie, which refers to the new Television show on ABC, then you will be asked if you want to attach a video of the show to your tweet.
Luckily Twitter will not be doing this automatically for you, but instead giving you the option to attach the media offered. Though as we said it is currently only on iOS it’s likely to be coming to other platforms too as they test the function further.
Twitter have really been amping it up with their tests and experiments recently, trying out other annoying things such as putting tweets from people you don’t follow in your timeline as well as tweets that people you follow have favourited. needless to say this is not going down well with users, and I think Twitter would do well to pay attention to what everyone is saying about their ‘experiments’.
by Helen Stirling
Big social news from Instagram today, as they are rolling out a new suite of tools over the next few days to help brands and marketers ‘better understand the performance of their paid and organic content on Instagram.’
They are going to be opening up analytics in three main areas, which are:
- Account insights
This will allow you to see how you’re increasing brand awareness through impressions, reach and engagement.
- Ad insights
This will help you track and monitor the results and performance of any paid campaigns, and includes number on impressions, reach and frequency for each individual advert.
- Ad staging
This means you can preview, save and collaborate on ad creative for upcoming campaigns.
If you want to read more about the new tools, you can do so on Instagram’s blog.
by Iona St Joseph
Here are your Likes and Fails for the day.
Soundcloud is going to be adding adverts to their platform for the first time ever. This is being introduced alongside a program which will allow it’s content creators to make money on the platform, which sounds much like YouTube’s offering. The program will have three tiers, partner, pro and premier, of which the premier is the highest tier. Premier allows content creators to make money through their tracks through advertising, but only when their tracks are played in the US. The revenue made will be split between the content creator and Soundcloud. At the launch of this program the premier tier will be invite only.
So from now on US listeners will begin to hear the adverts when listening to certain tracks on the site. These will initially be from mostly the company’s brand partners.
Alex Lijung, founder and CEO of SoundCloud said:
“The introduction of advertising is an important step for creators. Every time you see or hear an ad, an artist gets paid… In addition to supporting creators, ads will keep the service free and open for people to listen to SoundCloud.”
The partner tier is free for content creators and lets you share your first track as well as recieve feedback and basic stats. The pro level is the same but paid and with more upload time and more detailed stats.
You may have heard about the recent horrific news of James Foley an American Journalist who was beheaded at the hands of the IS terrorist group. There is unfortunately footage of the event spreading around online which is said to be harrowing and unsuitable for viewing, especially if it were to be seen by youngsters. There are now warnings in place that watching, downloading or sharing the material is illegal, and that you should not go seeking the material.
A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said:
“We would like to remind the public that viewing, downloading or disseminating extremist material within the UK may constitute an offence under terrorism legislation.”
YouTube says that they are actively trying to remove the footage, as well as removing accounts which belong to extremist groups and terrorists. This alongside a Twitter campaign encouraging people to not share the clip and to remove it if they had already. Twitter have been deleting tweets that include links to the video. This should help to remove the attention from IS which is what they so greatly crave.
by Helen Stirling
A Social Media Agency’s Likes and Fails – 20th August – Snapchat Discovery & Secret app to be removed
Good morning, we’re here to bring you the hottest and the not-test in Social Media today. Today we’re looking at Sanpchat’s expansion plans as well as a Brazilian judge’s agenda to get Secret removed from Google and Apple app stores as well as all phones!
Snapchat is looking to expand their app’s offering. Currently the app has no way of generating revenue, so the first option one may think of is to introduce advertising to the app, which is one of the avenues that Snapchat will be exploring, but there are other plans too. The rumours are that Snapchat want to introduce a sort of ‘snap news’ to the app. The service is apparently to be called Snapchat Discovery and would allow users to read daily editions of publications as well as look at pictures and video clips associated with the stories by holding down on the images like you normally would in the app. The company has apparently been in talks with dozens of online content providers, with publications such as the Mail Online in talks to provide content on the app.
If Snapchat were to link up with other content poviders it would definitely make it more appealing to advertisers. The Snapchat Discovery feature will likely be the first feature of the app to offer ‘sponsored’ stories, another opportunity for brands to promote themselves and their advertisements.
This is a good move for the company which has now been running for 3 years and continues to grow it’s user base everyday. It will likely offer the app it’s first revenue, and help to build the company up even more.
A Brazilian judge has ruled that Apple and Google must remove the app Secret from all of their local devices and app stores. The judge was reportedly pushed too far by one case where bullying and intimidation had been happening on the app and the only way to solve this was to order Apple and Google to remove the app locally. The app is usually used to anonymously share gossip, or personal thoughts without them linking to yourself.
If Apple and Google don’t agree to remove the app then they will penalized by the Brazilian court for around $9,000 a day, that’s not a load of money in terms of the amount of revenue these companies make, but it may be easier in the long run if the just remove the app from local app stores and phones to remove themselves from the charges.
The request is definitely one that the two companies can fulfill, they’ve removed apps from their respective stores before and they can technically pull or block software that is installed on their gadgets. Though this is only usually used if the there is a malware outbreak.
So we’ll have to wait and see if the companies remove the app, pay up or instead contest the ruling, which seems likely in the circumstances.
by Helen Stirling